When do lawyers object

Most of them occur under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, as a super-majority of the cases in which I am involved are filed in Texas state court. Defending a deposition means that you, as an attorney, present the witness to offer testimony. Sometimes the witness is your client. Sometimes the witness is a corporate representative or an employee of your corporate client. Sometimes the witness is an expert your side retains to offer specialized testimony to assist the jury in a particular area.

After I defend a deposition, one of the most common questions. In Texas, the Rules of Civil Procedure only allow attorneys to object on 3 grounds: form, non-responsive answer, or leading. The latter two are easy enough to decipher as a lay person. When an attorney objects to form in Texas, here are the things with which the objecting attorney could have a problem with that particular question.

Hopefully, this helps potential witnesses who give depositions in Texas to understand the different things wrong with questions asked of them. If the witness takes a second to process the question before an answer is given, it gives the attorneys in the room time to object to form, which could give the witness insight that there is something wrong with the question. The goal of any deposition is to get truthful, complete, and accurate testimony. Understanding the objections that will be made, as well as what those objections actually mean, can help witnesses to achieve these goals.

Hopefully, any potential witnesses find this blog post helpful in this regard, understanding and appreciating the legal disclaimer associated with this blog. Daniel Knight practices in the areas of admiralty and maritime law, as well as general civil litigation and appellate issues.

He has expertise in Home About Archives Contributors Disclaimer chamberlainlaw. Search Blog. Objections to Form. At several points during the deposition, Plaintiff objected to the form of the question posed but did not further specify his arguments as to why the form was improper in his objections, and Mr.

Wise testified in response. Objections to form must sufficiently explain the objection so that the interrogator is able to revise the question and avoid the problem.

The lone case cited that found objections to the form were waived is Batelli v. Batelli , which was decided almost forty years before Rule 30 c 3 was amended, said only:. However, it is one which under Rule 32 c 2 , Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is waived unless objected to at the taking of the deposition.

Batelli , F. The last time a court cited Batelli for this proposition was in , fifteen years before the amendments to Rule 30 c 3. See United States v. Kearney , F. But one issue does need additional elaboration. Any objections that a party wishes to make at a deposition must be stated concisely on the record when the deposition is taken.

But not all objections have to be made at the time a deposition is taken. Generally, only an objection that would alert the questioner of a ground for objection that could be corrected during the deposition must be made at the time of the deposition.

Thus, if a question is propounded in an improper form, the objection should be stated concisely on the record during the deposition in a manner that provides the questioner with a reasonable opportunity to correct the form of the question. Failure to do so waives the objection. Well, you can hold it up. You might need to refer to it in a minute. My son wants me to ask you, does it look like any of that chicken has been eaten? Parties have to go through a process to enter documentary or physical evidence into the court record.

During that process, the party that is entering the evidence will show the document, item, etc. Be prepared to explain why the evidence should or should not be admitted. Because demonstrative evidence is usually a combination of testimony and documentary evidence, how you object will depend on what is actually happening in court.

Sometimes a witness might draw a diagram in court and then the party questioning the witness may ask to admit the diagram into evidence. You may be able to object while the witness is testifying and drawing the diagram, or you could object at the point where the other party tries to enter the diagram into evidence.

Sometimes an opposing lawyer or party may prepare demonstrative evidence ahead of time, which could be slideshows, poster boards, etc. If this is the case, you can object to the evidence being entered into the record at the time the opposing party offers it into evidence.

Keep in mind that for any form of evidence explained above, an objection should only be made if it is objectionable. In other words, there must be a reason for your objection, such as one of the ones listed in What are some common objections?

All rights reserved. Department of Justice. Neither the U. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this website including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided.

Skip to main content.